This is incredibly well-documented work. The detail about the insider rattling off standard automated controls during the interview and Remitly suddenly determining they were a "bad team fit" is genuinely chilling. When a financial services company abruptly terminates an interview the moment someone mentions FinCEN checks and SAR pattern detection, that tells you everything about their compliance posture. What's particularly concerning is how the low barrier to entry (just $200k in capital) creates perverse incentives for these remittance services to compete on lax oversight rather than better service. The comparison to USAA's compliance failures and subsequent forced asset sales provides a concrete example of what regulators can do when they actually enforce existing rules.The fact that this becomes a competitve advantage in attracting customers who specifically need to avoid scrutiny is the darkest part.
1. Remittance payments are usually flagged to the FBI in anything that is over $10,000. All of them are at least put on a suspicious notice to the FBI. The case of it being massive fraud is highly improbable, because the FBI WILL call you in for it, especially if it is as numerous as you claim. You will be under investigation for it. This is basic information that you don't seem to be aware of. Whether the FBI or other government organizations can get to it on time is another matter.
2. The cited source of an Indian billionaire shows that she has no connection to the government of India. This is your citation. She mentioned she wanted to boost US-Indian relations due to friends in the Indian private sector; that is not on behalf of the government of India. Neither of you seem to understand this. There's a difference between people wanting unity and being paid or working under the interests of a foreign government to do so. The fact I have to clarify this speaks to your ignorance and the ignorance of your audience.
3. Most spying according to ex-CIA officials is from Israel, because Israel tries to steal our military technology and they often sell it to China. They even opened the Port of Haifa to China.
If you want the real danger to US national interests, I wrote a blog post recently and I would like for you to consider reading it as I have read yours: https://jarinjove.com/2025/12/01/zionistubermensch/
This is incredibly well-documented work. The detail about the insider rattling off standard automated controls during the interview and Remitly suddenly determining they were a "bad team fit" is genuinely chilling. When a financial services company abruptly terminates an interview the moment someone mentions FinCEN checks and SAR pattern detection, that tells you everything about their compliance posture. What's particularly concerning is how the low barrier to entry (just $200k in capital) creates perverse incentives for these remittance services to compete on lax oversight rather than better service. The comparison to USAA's compliance failures and subsequent forced asset sales provides a concrete example of what regulators can do when they actually enforce existing rules.The fact that this becomes a competitve advantage in attracting customers who specifically need to avoid scrutiny is the darkest part.
I can't believe this is happening.
Thanks for the hard work, Matt
Good to see you at your new perch at The Blaze
This article is wrong:
1. Remittance payments are usually flagged to the FBI in anything that is over $10,000. All of them are at least put on a suspicious notice to the FBI. The case of it being massive fraud is highly improbable, because the FBI WILL call you in for it, especially if it is as numerous as you claim. You will be under investigation for it. This is basic information that you don't seem to be aware of. Whether the FBI or other government organizations can get to it on time is another matter.
2. The cited source of an Indian billionaire shows that she has no connection to the government of India. This is your citation. She mentioned she wanted to boost US-Indian relations due to friends in the Indian private sector; that is not on behalf of the government of India. Neither of you seem to understand this. There's a difference between people wanting unity and being paid or working under the interests of a foreign government to do so. The fact I have to clarify this speaks to your ignorance and the ignorance of your audience.
3. Most spying according to ex-CIA officials is from Israel, because Israel tries to steal our military technology and they often sell it to China. They even opened the Port of Haifa to China.
If you want the real danger to US national interests, I wrote a blog post recently and I would like for you to consider reading it as I have read yours: https://jarinjove.com/2025/12/01/zionistubermensch/