Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peebo Preboskenes's avatar

I see the indians have invaded this comments section as well as my workplace. I've worked in software engineering for over 20 years. When I started back in the early 2000s there were a few indians in a group of roughly 100 devs where I worked (a major European bank with presence in the US). Now I work at a major American bank and my entire group is Indian with the exception of a few Chinese and myself (the token white guy). They've also offshored some of their operations to India and many of them work for the bank there for a year or two and then come here through the bank's internal transfer process. My manager is Indian and most of the names on every email dist list are Indian. They're not better software devs. In fact many are unimpressive. Rather, they do the bidding of mgmt without argument or debate which is causing the systems to decay as vital infrastructure is ignored. It's pernicious and subtle damange but as inevitable as the sun coming up in the east.

Robert Peter Kearns's avatar

Your post, however well-intended is pregnant with staggering degree of ignorance regarding _Indians_. _Indians_ ... aren't migrating to the world in worrisome numbers... it's specifically... Brahmin. You can't parse this argument more carefully, and you're not even trying... you're not trying to do the one thing you MUST do. You have to understand Brahmin on _their_ domain.

Brahmin... the 'priest' caste, _rationalize_ their supremacy... not just status.... _supremacy_ as in Nazi supremacy, Zionist supremacy, Muslim supremacy... based on Varna. They've created a closed-loop logic cycle of _Karma_ in which Varna _determines_ your lot in life.... in other words... you're an ubermensch _because_ that's the way of the universe and you should accept your lot in life.... Brahmin are estimated to be just 5% of India... but they're 85% of Indians who migrate to the US.

The epistemic envelope about Brahmin falsification is directly _linked_ to this idea of eugenicist supremacy that very closely parallels Han Chinese 'face.' ... Brahmin have the ultimate hack though... Varna dictates that Brahmin are innately superior and their Karma proves it. The Brahmin brain argues that _superiority_ is its own outcome. It doesn't need to be _proven_. It's self-evident. What happens if you do this long enough = India... you get civilizational stagnation that drags out over 1,000 years. What do all these groups have in common, Han Chinese, Zionists... Brahmin... they engage in _dialectic_ in which IF they can falsify their status by way of semantic subterfuge... they have _proven_ their status. BECAUSE you were too stupid to figure it out. Do you get it? Han Chinese think that _cheating_ is the envelope of excellence itself, because it hacks semantics.

Do you get it? It's not _just_ laziness... it's semantic self-rationalization. Do you know what else Han Chinese, Brahmin, Zionists all have in common aside from semantic subterfuge. They've constructed a victim ideology predicated on narcissism. These are basically narcissism engines... what's the end result: they lie because we let them. That proves their superiority. When you catch them lying they collapse into a victim tautology. That puts you on the defensive.

The Brahmin use _Varna_; Zionists use _return to Israel_ and Han Chinese use _face_ as their self-rationalization protocols... and these _ideas_ bind them together as tribes. Islam's tautology is Mohammed, almost self-explanatory.

We're allowing these third world primitives to run roughshod over us because we _had_ a high-trust open society predicated on alignment to semantic _agreement_ in which our own semantic fidelity is being used against us.

The one thing we SHOULD do... be _better_ at semantics, is the one thing we're not doing. We're becoming dumber, angrier, and more incoherent. We need to be united, unapologetic, and be able to run circles around their bullshit. You can't do it NOT understanding the rules of _their_ game.

223 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?